Showing posts with label Shameful. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shameful. Show all posts

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Race Might Determine This Race Unfortunately

First Jack Cafferty on Friday:

Next, the report just released by Yahoo:

In a report sure to spark a national conversation on race, an AP-Yahoo News study reported Saturday  that white prejudice could be a significant enough factor to undermine Barack Obama’s bid to be the first black president of the United States.

The AP-Yahoo study concluded that white Democratic racism may cause 2.5 percent of voters to "turn away from Obama because of his race," roughly the margin of President Bush's victory over John F. Kerry in 2004.

The AP-Yahoo study found that one-third of white Democrats cited a negative adjective when describing blacks and, of those, just 58 percent said they planned to back Obama. For example, AP reported that more than a quarter of white Democrats agreed that “if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites.” Four in 10 white independents agreed, while a quarter described blacks as "violent."

White Democratic supporters of Hillary Rodham Clinton were almost twice as likely as Obama’s primary supporters to cite a negative adjective in describing blacks — a finding consistent with trends in earlier polling. Only 59 percent of Clinton’s white Democratic supporters wanted Obama to be president.

The report may now begin a conversation on race, one notably absent considering the historic nature of Obama’s bid — and his own call for such a conversation in a speech delivered after racially charged remarks from his longtime pastor Jeremiah Wright emerged during the primary season. Just last month Obama accepted the Democratic nomination on the 45th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech.

Throughout the 2008 presidential race, pollsters have been struggling to accurately gauge the degree of prejudice among whites and how that may affect the final outcome of this election. Democratic primary exit polls suggested that racism was a factor in the vote of as many as a fifth of white party members.

Analysts have long presumed that racism was underreported, as some who factor race into their vote would not be willing to admit that prejudice to pollsters.
Any possible latent racial prejudice among white Democrats has been of particular interest to analysts because it could potentially undo Obama’s presidential bid. The AP study found that racism pervades political identity but that Republicans are already predisposed to support John McCain, regardless of their views on race.

To detect unreported racial biases, the study, among other metrics, sat those interviewed in front of monitors, using black and white faces to “measure implicit racial attitudes, or prejudices that are so deeply rooted that people may not realize they have them.” The survey then used statistical modeling to estimate how representative those interviewed were of the electorate overall.
The survey's conclusions are likely to be controversial. AP reported that its team of pollsters “set out to determine why Obama is locked in a close race with McCain even as the political landscape seems to favor Democrats.”

The study, and report, both ignore other weaknesses widely considered by seasoned analysts to also undercut Obama’s bid, among them his inexperience, generally liberal record and the fact that no northern Democrat has been elected president since 1960.

Still, analysts have also long agreed that race was a crucial unknown factor in this presidential race. The study also notes that race has helped Obama win near uniform support among blacks — who have long tilted overwhelmingly Democratic — though it does not consider whether some whites are also supporting Obama because his victory could symbolize a large step forward in race relations.
The study also did not test whether another black candidate, with perhaps different views or biography, would have fared better among whites. Other critical analysts may note that the study does not investigate the voting history of those interviewed, as some Democrats have supported Republicans from Ronald Reagan to George W. Bush.

The study also does not investigate whether the views of those interviewed on significant issues, like abortion or national security, may drive conservative Democrats and independents, who in the Democratic primaries disproportionally favored Hillary Clinton.

Perhaps most noteworthy, the AP notes that the study itself found that “race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama.” It notes that “doubts about his competency loom even larger.”

More than one in five Democrats, the AP notes, questioned whether Obama can enact “the change they want” and said they were likely to vote against him for this reason.
The AP study also seems to have been conducted among a population of Democrats more skeptical of Obama than normal. While both the ABC News/Washington Post polls and the massive weekly summaries of the Gallup Poll show that since late August between 83 and 85 percent of Democrats say they will vote for Obama, the AP study interviewed a population where just seven in 10 Democrats said they support Obama.But perhaps the importance of the study is that it demonstrates racial attitudes also cannot be simply dismissed.

When those interviewed were offered a choice of positive and negative adjectives to describe blacks, one-fifth of all whites said the words “boastful” or "violent" “strongly applied,” while 29 percent cited the word "complaining.”

Friday, September 19, 2008

Boston Celtics @ The White House

Even though I'll have forgotten about this ten minutes from after this is posted I'm not happy to see this. Paul Pierce is my dude but he look a little too damn happy to be there.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Parents Today Suck

You see this picture right here? Good old belt on ass. Never hurt nothing or nobody. Sure your ego suffered a bit and your feelings got hurt and if you had any cruel hearted siblings you heard about it for a week or so but generally you got over the sting of the belt rather quickly and you learned not to repeat that same mistake again that hooked up cowhide leather with your ass for a blind date. My asswhoopings were legendary. My dad used to take me to the basement and lock the door and hold one of my arms as we went to work on me with the other in making sure I had no chance for escape. He made sure I left my pride and a trail of tears in that basement and that whatever I did that was foul or would reflect poorly or disrespectfully on the family or the way he raised my sister and I would not be tolerated. Girls learned the lessons through the belt twice as quick as boys as when you consider I took three times as many whoopings as my sister, that number might be lowballing the discrepancy between the two sexes.

Today though? Nothing like that. Kids get punk ass talks and masquerade timeouts as discipline. Let me tell you something, there's nothing you can say with a timeout that you can't say louder and more forcefully with a spanking. You walk up to a frenchman and he probably won't understand anything other than French and it would be foolish to speak Portuguese to him and assume he'll understand you. Likewise, the language of children are asswhoopings and to speak any other language as a parent is derelict in your responsibility to get through to them in a meaningful and tangible fashion.

Which brings me to two disturbing stories breaking today, the first in video format from a recent Dr. Phil episode in which a punk ass kid is running his mother and speaking as an equal to someone you isn't her equal. I won't say anymore, I'll let you watch this.

Shameful. If the mother had been doling out physical punishment more than twice in her life maybe the kid would have respected her gangster.

Or by now you may have learned of the 13 year old girl (pictured to the left) whose put two men behind bars for unknowingly having sex with her whom they believed was a 19 year old divorced woman after they met up with her through the popular Myspace website. Of course Myspace was the vessell for this fuckery where the 22 and 24 year old men were duped into hooking up with the 13 year old. Myspace.
Alisha Dean had told Morris Williams she was 18. Her Myspace (now edited and private) said she was 19 and divorced. But after having sex with Alisha, Williams got worried. Things she said and did tipped him off, and he went to see Jerry Dean, who told Williams that yeah, his daughter was only 13. Then Jerry Dean called the police to press charges. Alisha’s public Myspace is now down, but it wasn’t, even when the case went to court yesterday. The suggestive material was enough to make grown women blush. A couple of her videos show the minor child shaking her womanly booty like she’s working the pole. It’s totally believable to me that young men might not realize the girl’s age if she lied about it.

When Morris Williams found out Alisha Dean was not 22, but 13, he immediately went to Dean’s father and told him. Dean’s father wanted Morris behind bars, just like Darwin Mills, who Alisha pulled the same stunt on in January 2007. Williams is now serving a year in jail. Mills, 5 years in Jail. Dean’s My Space Page now says she is 16, three years older than she really is.


With all the stories you hear about Myspace and all the foul shit that goes on the company ought to raise the age of registering to 18 so that whatever goes down via Myspace at least everybody's grown and assumes responsibility.

This is just a bad day for parenting.